Welcome to BadPsychics, your trusted resource for uncovering the truth behind fake psychics and debunking supernatural claims. We are committed to promoting skepticism and critical thinking, providing you with clear and factual information about the paranormal and pseudoscientific practices.
At BadPsychics, we celebrate the power of science and rational inquiry. Our mission is to expose fraudulent psychics and unverified supernatural phenomena, empowering you with knowledge.
Throughout history, the allure of the mystical and the supernatural has captivated human imagination. From the famed oracles of ancient Greece to the modern-day psychics who claim to communicate with the spirit world, the history of psychic and mediumship claims is a tapestry woven with threads of skepticism. In this exploration, we'll journey through time, examining the dubious nature of these claims and questioning the legitimacy of those who profess to possess otherworldly abilities.
Ancient Oracles:
The Oracle of Delphi, situated at the Temple of Apollo, was a renowned center for divination in ancient Greece. Supposedly endowed with the ability to communicate with the gods, the oracle provided cryptic messages that were open to interpretation. Revered by the ancient Greeks as the most powerful oracle, this sacred site held immense influence over political, military, and personal decisions, shaping the course of history through cryptic messages uttered by the Pythia, the priestess of Apollo.
The Oracle of Delphi was part of the larger sanctuary dedicated to Apollo, a god associated with prophecy, healing, and music. Pilgrims from across the Greek world flocked to Delphi seeking answers to pressing questions about their future, decisions, or conflicts. The sanctuary, with its impressive architecture and stunning views, provided a sacred space where mortals could commune with the divine.
Medieval Mystics and Renaissance Charlatans:
Moving through the centuries, the Middle Ages and the Renaissance saw a proliferation of mystics and seers who claimed to possess supernatural insight. Many of these individuals were, in fact, opportunistic charlatans preying on the fears and uncertainties of their time.
The Rise of Spiritualism:
The 19th century witnessed the emergence of spiritualism, a movement centered around the belief in communication with the spirits of the deceased. Mediums held séances, claiming to channel spirits and deliver messages from beyond the grave. While some believers were genuinely convinced of the authenticity of these mediums, skeptics argued that the phenomena observed during séances could be explained by natural factors such as the power of suggestion, suggestibility, and even outright fraud.
Twentieth Century and Beyond:
As we progress into the 20th century and beyond, psychic phenomena have found a new home in popular culture. Television shows, books, and movies perpetuate the mystique surrounding psychics and mediums. However, skeptics continue to question the validity of these claims, pointing to the lack of scientific evidence supporting the existence of supernatural abilities. Many purported psychics have been exposed as frauds, casting a shadow of doubt over the entire industry.
The Scientific Skepticism:
One of the primary criticisms from skeptics is the absence of empirical evidence to substantiate psychic and mediumship claims. Despite numerous investigations, controlled experiments, and challenges, no conclusive scientific proof has emerged to support the existence of supernatural abilities. Skeptics argue that if these phenomena were genuine, they should be replicable under controlled conditions, yet time and again, such conditions reveal the limitations of psychic claims.
Conclusion:
The history of psychic and mediumship claims is rife with instances of skepticism, fraud, and exploitation. From the oracles of ancient Greece to the modern-day psychics who grace our screens, the allure of the mysterious persists. While believers find solace in the idea of a connection with the supernatural, skeptics maintain a critical eye, urging a demand for evidence and scientific scrutiny. As we navigate the murky waters of psychic phenomena, the skeptical viewpoint serves as a reminder that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Until such evidence is presented, the veil of mystery surrounding psychic and mediumship claims remains intact.
For those of you unaware, the Most Haunted team have launched a Stage Show! You can hear the crackling of knees as people rush to their landlines to ring up the ticket office.
Unfortunately the show at the Aylesbury Theatre has finished, and as sad as that is, we do have access to the official reviews of the show! Not from the critics, but from the loyal fanbase who turned out in their tens to support Most Haunted and enjoy this new experience.
Lets take a look at the verified reviews direct from the Aylesbury Theatre website. (Feel free to check the site out for yourself, although I suspect they will have the reviews deleted at some point.)
3.0 star rating Mags from London, England
MOSTLY CLIPS FROM TV SERIES
Was OK but was surprised that Karl was very smutty from word go, bit cringy to be honest...think they were trying to inject humour into it but maybe it doesn't need this sort of humour... lots of clips from TV series. Yvette good host and clearly enjoys it.
2.0 star rating Amanda from Stoke-on-Trent
MOST HAUNTED STAGE SHOW
Very disappointing. Most of the show is spent watching clips of previous Most Haunted Shows!
2.0 star rating Lew from Lancashire, England
UNDERWHELMING
I saw this last night and I agree, too many clips and not enough investigating. They needed to use more equipment and do more hands on. Use all the equipment and show through it how investigation can bring things forward then the scary bit people were craving for can "come forward" Clips I'd seen and I didn't need to see so many again. The first half was, dare I say boring!!!! It needed more. Use a spirit box, motion sensors, voice recorder, and motion detector that shows bodily lines on screen. This needs revamping otherwise I can see people not believing. Less clips more investigation.
Ok I know those reviews are not great, but that is just page 1 of the reviews, surely page 2 will be full of great reviews.
2.0 star rating Lil from London, England
SEXIST & HOMOPHOBIC COMMENTS RUINED SHOW!
Show was on the whole entertaining and fun. Cast were great except Karl who kept making really gross innuendos & also put on an effeminate voice when talking to the audience? Felt really awkward and uncomfortable as an audience member but you could tell Karl thought he was hilarious.
2.0 star rating Maria from London, England
HILARIOUSLY BAD
I mean, I went being utterly cynical and hoping to rip the piss out of this and I wasnt disappointed in that regard. The highlight was Carl's really laddish/smutty humour (how much had he had ???) and the low point was the endless clips from the show- come on you cant promise a live show then just show old episodes?? there was a live seance right at the end but there needed to be way more actual hands on stuff with the audience. Of course its all performance, so make it more of a performance! Dont pretend its anything other than a comedic satire of paranormal investigating,
2.0 star rating Jay from London, England
MOST HAUNTED THE STAGE SHOW
Disappointing overall, yes lots of old clips, although didn’t mind too much about that and Yvette holds things together well. The live investigation went nowhere however. Most jarring though we’re the antics of an unfunny Karl, who for some reason thinks it’s a good idea to rev up the smut level repeatedly and insult the audience. Yvette mock tells him off for this, but really should have a serious word! Large parts of the audience where I was sitting were clearly annoyed by him.Oh dear,maybe someone once told him he was funny and he believed them!!
2.0 star rating Tone from London, England
MOST HAUNTED LIVE
Well, Ive always enjoyed most haunted (not a believer but enjoy it still) and looked forward to the show for a bit of fun. However anything enjoyable was ruined by Karl. Smutty, crass and unfunny, including acting camp when talking to the audience. Yvette was very proffesional. Yes , there are clips but it was for me a but if fun. Karl needs to turn it down a bit or not be in it.
1.0 star rating Anon from London, England
SADLY A NIGHT OF WATCHING CLIPS I COULD HAVE WATCHED IN YOUTUBE
This had promise, but sadly we just watched numerous. Lips we could have watched in YouTube. And then was subjected to Karl’s very smutty and somewhat inappropriate inuendos and homophobic mockery.
1.0 star rating Ball from Cornwall, England
DISAPPOINTING
Basically watched a load of clips, smutty language from cast member, overall rather boring. Certainly did not deliver on what they are advertising.
1.0 star rating Dave from London, England
ABSOLUTE RUBBISH
Save your money. An absolute rubbish show. Basically watching clips from the past and thats it
Erm.. what about page 3???
1.0 star rating Claire from London, England
CRASS AND LEWD
When Carl thought it was appropriate to talk about "pulling out" of an audience participants mother the scene was set from the off. He was a pillock most of the night. Yvette did her best to hold it together, but we missed Derek, Richard, Cath. There was so much more they could have done, even with just the replays. You will have so much fun just getting a bunch of mates round, a few glasses and MH on TV. You don't need to go to the live show I'm afraid
1.0 star rating Anonymous from London, England
MOST HAUNTED
Very disappointed by tonight’s performance. Lots of unnecessary smutty comments including a downright rude comment, directed at an audience member made just minutes in to the show. Lots of ‘highlight’ clips, with repetitive narration from the cast. So much scope for better content & I have left with a very low opinion of Karl.
1.0 star rating ANON from London, England
AWKWARD!
I enjoyed the show and didn’t even mind watching old clips back as I hadn’t seen all of the tv show episodes. Karl (the presenters) behaviour was very offensive throughout. It was clear he was very drunk (slurring words etc!?) from the beginning. Crass, sexual innuendo jokes directed towards audience members totally ruined the night and so unnecessary.
1.0 star rating James Welsby from London, England
THE SCARY PART IS THAT I CAN'T GET A REFUND
I came to the show as an excited believer but it made me leave as a cold skeptic. I agree with the reviews, meagre, tedious content: essential a selection of YouTube clips. Think bare bones vs any fresh meat or, bone-chilling information. I really was hoping for more audience interaction and genuine frights vs death by PowerPoint. The first half felt like an eternity, the 'ghost hunt' had the most potential, but kept cutting away whenever something interesting 'happened.' Yvette was a consumate professional and kept the defibrillator on the corpse of the evening. I wish I could say the same about Karl. Karl’s language and ‘humour’ was vulgar, obscene, ranging from sexist to homophobic. Karl's lack of respect for the spirits, I can only imagine Karl enjoyed a few of these himself before the show, and the contempt for audience participants in the seance section, e.g. asking one lady, 'do you not know your own name?' was the final nail in the coffin. With Halloween approaching, I hope this is one show that gets exorcised. 1 star.
1.0 star rating Mr Roberts from London, England
CASH GRAB, POOR AND CRUDE
Nothing but clips edited together that make no sense, this was 70% of the show while an arrogant, crude and homophobic Karl lounged around on stage talking about the clips and thought he was funny. Some audience members went off to find nothing and the ouija board was a joke too. An obvious family cash grab as most cast are related!
1.0 star rating Embarrassed from London, England
POOR SHOW
Most Haunted was the show that opened up the Paranormal. Sadly it has not progressed over the years. The show was reliant on old clips. Karl was rude, but he thought he was funny. It was an embarrassment. Stop flogging a dead horse.
1.0 star rating Ash from Manchester
MOST AWFUL
It’s a few hours of my life that I’ll never get back. Mostly old clips of the programme which wouldn’t have been so bad but they were edited really badly so it was minutes of chaos and screaming. Karl was like an embarrassing old sleazy uncle that hardly gets invited to family get togethers when there’s young girls or gay relatives. He clearly has no filter but doesn’t care in fact he probably finds the negative reviews hilarious. The so called seance was laughable and the behind the scenes night vision section seemed pointless. They could have done this so well but did it so badly. They asked the audience if they are a believer? Yes I am but definitely not in them. We left early but tried not to catch the eye of Karl who spent what time he could amongst the audience being rude, homophobic and crass. I’ll stick with uncanny and leave most haunted in the past where it belongs
So there you have it, the reviews for the Stage Show are pretty damn clear.
Did you go to any of the shows? If you did feel free to leave a comment below with your experience, good or bad, but please be detailed.
Screengrab of some of the reviews below. And archives HERE and HERE
It is 2023 and for some reason I am still having to correct stories put out there about Derek Acorah and Most Haunted.
Yvette Fielding is currently on a Podcast tour as she tries to promote an upcoming Most Haunted Tour thing, and they have some big venues lined up, so are desperate to sell tickets.
I will address some of the claims Yvette made on the "Celebrity Catch Up: Life After That Thing I Did." Podcast.(No, I never heard of it either, guessing it is a show for washed up celebs, past their prime, desperate for any attention.), which are also being "picked up" by some tabloids. (These are paid for, placed articles in the papers, trust me, no reporter gives a damn about what a 90s Blue Peter presenter is saying on a podcast that no one listens too.)
"It used to really upset me. I mean, when we found out that Derek was a fake, I think I cried the first time because I had told him things about my deceased relatives and he told me things back,"Yvette Fielding.
First quote I want to respond to, Yvette Fielding KNEW Derek wasn't a genuine medium from the very first episode, if not before, they hired him because he was charismatic and entertaining, and probably the biggest name on the growing psychic circuit at the time, he had TV experience under his belt. But the idea she "found out" he was fake, years after him being on the show is a nonsense. Especially when you consider on this very website we were exposing him week in week out. HE GOT POSSESSED BY A CHIMP IN THE FIRST EVER EPISODE!
"And also, being on camera and him, you know, going into these alleged possessions and becoming very threatening to me and the team members to the point where he'd actually hurt us and we just thought that, 'Nah, there's something going on,' this is so bad, so that was upsetting."Yvette Fielding.
Ok, this is a very specific claim and one I had never heard of before. In all the years of Most Haunted I never heard anyone say that Derek Acorah hurt them. I have heard about other cast members doing things, which I wont say here and now, but never Derek.
So I decided to find out, and who better to ask than a person who was there on nearly every shoot. Derek's wife Gwen.
I asked Gwen straight, was there ever any complaint or report about Derek hurting someone in mid performance. She replied as follows.
"I was at more or less every filming and there was never a complaint. The possession stuff was welcomed and embraced because it pleased the audience and therefore pleased Living TV which in turn swelled the Antix coffers."Gwen Acorah.
I then decided to ask Gwen if Derek had ever been physically hurt by a member of the crew, her reply is as follows.
"The only person ever physically hurt was actually Derek when Stuart (during a live seance) threw a tumbler at Derek which resulted in him having a cut hand. It actually went out for all to see (I think Berry Pomeroy?). Stuart claimed that a spirit had made him do it."Gwen Acorah.
On the Podcast Yvette also addressed the fact that OFCOM had ruled that the show was "For Entertainment Purposes Only" and that it was obviously "Not a serious investigation".
She said.
"Then the Ofcom ruling came in, they watched the show and, because of Derek and the fakery, they watched the show and they said, 'No, we've decided that is for entertainment purposes only.' That was absolutely soul-destroying for us because it is real, it's a real investigation, we don't make it as a television show."Yvette Fielding.
I need to make a few things clear here. When the show started it was myself and various members of the BadPsychics family that sent in many complaints to OFCOM regarding MH, our aim was for them to either label the show as Entertainment Only, or to have it taken off the air, as clearly the show was faked.
OFCOM replied to us, that it was OBVIOUS that the show was not a serious investigation, and that it was clearly for Entertainment Purposes Only. Not long after that, such disclaimers had to go up regarding pretty much anything that involved the "occult".One of the reasons was actually do to with the show that Most Haunted copied, the BBC Parody show Ghost Watch. Which although labeled as satire, a lot of people thought was real. People watching had various mental breakdowns, I think someone killed themself, and basically the BBC got into a ton of trouble, and replays of the show were banned for a long time.
OFCOM labeled the show as not real, because the show was not real. Yes Derek was a part of that, as he was the star, but the show was clearly filled with trained actors and performers. Jason Karl in series 1 was an actor employed to play the part of a parapsychologist, ironically he was the best one they ever had on the show. The same with Ciaran O'Keeffe, regardless of his real life PhD, he was employed to play a part. Yvette Fielding, also a trained actress.
Keep in mind that we were exposing the entire show as faked, not just Derek. We showed many times from our "Most Haunted Mole" videos, what was really going on. Yvette is clearly rewriting history here.
For example I released the "Mary Loves Dick" video. This was a pre-record that they actually aired in a fake night vision filter on the live show. I got hold of the original tape that included what went on after they had "cut" the scene.
Another thing that needs to be addressed is the false notion that Derek Acorah was fired from Most Haunted after the "Kreed Kafer" thing. This is simply not true.
"We tell people everything is real, then it turns out he was a fake, so he had to go."Yvette Fielding.
As I have repeatedly stated on here, Derek was NEVER fired, his contract was up and he was leaving regardless. And luckily for me Gwen Acorah just 24 hours ago wrote about that on her social media, confirming everything I have said for years.
Here is what she wrote.
"I would like Antix to cast their minds back to a date in October 2004 when a meeting was requested in Manchester by Derek’s then agent, Stuart Hobday, at the Antix offices.
In attendance were Derek, Stuart, Karl, Yvette, Richard Wolffe and Clare Hollywood (both of Living TV).
The purpose of the meeting was for Derek to tender his resignation from the programme Most Haunted. Derek was feeling the strain of being involved in the programme and no longer wanted to continue being part of it.
An agreement was reached whereby Derek would complete one more series of the programme (Series 6) and 2 or 3 more lives, the last one being Halloween 2005.
A further arrangement was made that a member of Livingtv staff would be present at every filming to give Derek peace of mind that he would not be mistreated nor undermined. Those four people were Richard Wolffe, Claire Hollywood, Steve Jones and another lady who worked closely with the Living TV production team.
Richard Wolffe also promised to create a programme specifically for Derek and this is how Derek Acorah’s Ghost towns came about.
Filming commenced but by the time Spring 2005 came around Derek was on his knees with stress and at Sinai House he walked out of make up and away from the programme for the last time.
Claire Hollywood was in attendance and he told her that he was finished, that he’d do the last live at Halloween but that was it.
Gordon Smith was brought in to complete a short series 7 to make up the shortfall of series 6 programme numbers."Gwen Acorah.
Now what Gwen doesn't mention here is that the Mirror Article with the Kreed Kafer thing was released the day before (or the same day) that the Most Haunted Live was to air. The Mirror article, by the way, which had stolen a LOT of material from this very website, without crediting me.
The article was ONLY supposed to expose Derek, Karl and Ciaran had worked with the journalist to give him the story. But the journalist wanted a bigger story so used information from BadPsychics to pad it up. (I was in contact with him at the time, unbeknownst to Ciaran and Karl).
Living TV producers were beyond furious, as Karl had basically flushed the entire show and format down the toilet just as a way to try to bury Derek as he was leaving, remember as Gwen mentions Living TV had a new show lined up for Derek. The hilarious Ghost Towns.
Living TV bosses made it clear that if Derek didn't want to go on MHL he didn't have to. Keep in mind that Living TV were also concerned that Derek would sue them for breach of contract etc. If Derek did not appear on the live show, Most Haunted was finished, that would have been the end of the show.
Amazingly Derek decided he WOULD do the show. And literally stand face to face with people who had just stabbed in in the back and tried to ruin his post MH career. By doing that he literally saved Most Haunted from being cancelled for good.
The irony being that Derek saved Most Haunted, after they nearly self destructed.
That is the truth. Now please don't waste your money going to any Most Haunted show.
As we mourn the death of Michael Parkinson, I thought we should take a look back at one of his most memorable performances.
In the realm of horror, where imagination dances with the unknown, the 1992 BBC TV special "Ghostwatch" emerges as a chilling masterpiece that forever changed the landscape of televised horror. Blurring the lines between reality and fiction, "Ghostwatch" takes viewers on an unprecedented journey into the eerie, dark corners of the supernatural.
Set in the cozy backdrop of a live television program, "Ghostwatch" presents itself as an innocent exploration of paranormal phenomena, guided by respected TV personalities. Michael Parkinson, Sarah Greene, and Mike Smith lend their familiar faces to this ambitious endeavour, drawing viewers in with their affable charm. As the clock ticks closer to Halloween night, the show's façade begins to crack, paving the way for a hauntingly immersive experience.
What sets "Ghostwatch" apart is its ingenious use of realism. The show employs a mockumentary format, utilizing familiar elements of live television, including call-ins and on-the-spot reporting, to create an aura of authenticity. As the supernatural occurrences escalate, the tension mounts not only within the narrative but also within the living rooms of its unsuspecting audience. The blending of fictional horror with genuine audience reactions is a stroke of brilliance that induces a sense of shared fear and disbelief.
The narrative unfolds within a seemingly ordinary suburban household, once occupied by a troubled mother and her children, who are tormented by an elusive entity known as "Pipes." As the TV crew investigates, events take a sinister turn. Shadows loom, poltergeist activity abounds, and the line between reality and the paranormal becomes progressively more blurred. The anticipation and psychological torment that the characters experience begin to seep into the viewers' subconscious, fostering an unforgettable sense of unease.
"Ghostwatch" thrives on subtlety and the fear of the unseen. It masterfully crafts an atmosphere where every creak, every flicker of light, and every fleeting shadow sends shivers down the spine. The show's ability to exploit the viewer's imagination is its greatest strength, as it's often what is left unsaid that carries the most terrifying weight.
However, the audaciousness of "Ghostwatch" cannot go without controversy. The boundary-pushing nature of the production led to public uproar and claims of irresponsibility on the part of the BBC. The delicate balance between entertainment and deception became a topic of intense debate, shedding light on the ethical considerations surrounding horror and the media's power to influence.
In retrospect, "Ghostwatch" stands as a trailblazing example of its genre. Its influence can be felt in found footage horror, mockumentaries, and reality TV horror programs that followed. The way it exploited the intimacy of the home through television and blurred the lines between reality and fiction became a cornerstone for modern horror storytelling.
In conclusion, the 1992 BBC TV special "Ghostwatch" remains an enduring and enigmatic masterpiece that polarized audiences and solidified its place in horror history. With its innovative approach to blending the mundane with the macabre, it redefined the boundaries of televised horror and left an indelible mark on the hearts and minds of those brave enough to experience its haunting allure.
In recent times, the spiritual healer João Teixeira de Faria, popularly known as "John of God," or "João de Deus" has gained significant attention worldwide for his alleged miraculous healing abilities. However, behind the veil of fame and adoration lies a troubling truth. This article aims to shed light on the controversial aspects of John of God's life and practices, based on documented reports and investigations.
Early Popularity and Charismatic Appeal
John of God rose to prominence in the small town of Abadiânia, Brazil, where he claimed to channel the spirits of deceased doctors and perform miraculous healings. Thousands flocked to his Casa de Dom Inácio de Loyola, seeking hope and relief from various ailments. His charismatic appeal and alleged ability to diagnose illnesses without prior medical knowledge made him an attractive figure to many desperate individuals seeking a cure.
Allegations of Sexual Abuse and Exploitation
In 2018, the facade of John of God's spiritual persona began to crumble when numerous women came forward with allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation. These brave individuals accused him of coercing them into engaging in sexual acts under the pretense of spiritual healing. The testimonies painted a disturbing picture of a man who had abused his position of power and preyed upon vulnerable individuals seeking solace.
Legal Action and Investigation
Following the initial wave of allegations, Brazilian authorities launched a thorough investigation into John of God's activities. Law enforcement agencies searched his properties and discovered hidden rooms filled with cash, firearms, and personal belongings of his victims. The evidence collected strengthened the case against him, and in 2019, he was ultimately sentenced to 63 years in prison for rape and sexual assault.
Exploiting the Vulnerable and Peddling False Hope
John of God's case serves as a reminder of the dangers of blind faith and the exploitation of vulnerable individuals in search of hope and healing. Many of his followers had invested significant sums of money in his healing sessions, only to discover that their trust had been manipulated for personal gain. The promise of supernatural powers can easily deceive those who are desperate and willing to believe in miracles.
Questioning the Supernatural
While some followers continue to defend John of God's alleged healing abilities, it is crucial to approach such claims with skepticism. The revelations surrounding his criminal actions expose a pattern of abuse, manipulation, and the misuse of faith for personal gain. The exploitation of vulnerable individuals under the guise of spirituality tarnishes the reputation of genuine healers and discredits the important work done by medical professionals.
Moving Forward: Holding Abusers Accountable
The case of John of God highlights the importance of speaking out against abuse, regardless of an individual's perceived spiritual status. It also emphasizes the significance of thorough investigations and legal action to ensure that victims receive justice and perpetrators are held accountable.
Conclusion
The truth about John of God is a stark reminder of the dangers associated with blind faith and the exploitation of vulnerable individuals. While he once captivated the hearts and minds of thousands with his alleged healing abilities, his criminal actions exposed a disturbing reality. It is crucial for society to remain vigilant and question claims that seem too good to be true, ensuring that those in positions of power and influence are held accountable for their actions.
In a fateful courtroom scene on July 10, 2023, a blend of anticipation and despair permeated the air as João Teixeira de Faria, the infamous Brazilian faith healer known as 'John of God,' was handed down an additional sentence of 99 years. This severe punishment was a direct consequence of his abhorrent sexual crimes.
.jpg)
.jpg)
