Halloween and the Science of the Supernatural: Why We Still Believe in the Occult

Article by Jon Donnis

Every year, as October fades and pumpkins begin to rot on doorsteps, the same old stories come crawling back. Haunted houses. Witchcraft. Curses. Ghosts. Halloween has always been tangled up with the occult, but what keeps these ancient superstitions alive in an age that's supposed to be ruled by reason? The answer isn't found in the spirit world. It's found in the human mind.

Many of Halloween's darker traditions stretch back centuries, to a time when fear filled the spaces that science hadn't yet explained. The Celtic festival of Samhain marked the end of summer and the start of the cold, dark months, when people believed the dead could wander among the living. Without any understanding of infection, decomposition or changing weather, unseen forces felt like the most logical explanation. Fires were lit to keep spirits away. Faces were carved into turnips to scare them off. Disguises were worn to blend in with the restless dead. These rituals weren't proof of ghosts, they were ways to make sense of an unpredictable world.

From a scientific point of view, it's easy to understand why such beliefs endure. Humans are built to find meaning in chaos. Our brains constantly search for patterns, even when they don't exist. It's the reason we see faces in clouds or hear whispers in static. Psychologists call it "agent detection", and it once helped our ancestors survive. Mistaking the wind for a wolf was safer than missing the real thing. The problem is that instinct hasn't gone away. It now fuels ghost sightings, possessions, and the odd Ouija board story that gets passed around after a few drinks. When we expect to see something supernatural, our minds make sure we do.

Modern Halloween rituals still play on the same tricks of perception. Haunted houses use darkness, sudden noises and tight spaces to make our bodies panic before our minds can catch up. The racing heart, the jump scare, the flood of adrenaline, it all feels like proof that something real is happening. In truth, it's only proof of how easily fear can bend reason.

The occult, from séances to spells, feeds on that mixture of doubt and desire. People want to believe that there's something more, that the dead might not be gone, that coincidence might carry meaning. Psychics and mediums know this, and many are skilled at turning human vulnerability into business. Techniques like cold reading and suggestion create convincing results, but under proper testing they fall apart. Remove the cues and the emotional hooks, and the "spirit world" falls silent.

Halloween is curious because it lets us indulge in all of this without shame. For one night, skeptics join the believers. We watch ghost films, light candles, and tell each other stories that make the skin crawl. It's not that we think any of it's true. It's just fun to let the irrational side out for a while. Maybe it's even healthy to remember that our ancient fears are still there, humming quietly in the background.

Science can explain every part of the Halloween myth, from why our ancestors feared the dark to why ghost stories still get under our skin. But it can't quite erase our appetite for mystery. That's the beauty of it. The real magic of Halloween isn't found in spirits or spells, but in our strange, brilliant ability to invent them.

When Prophecies Fail: Predictions That Never Happened

By Jon Donnis

People love a good prophecy. Whether it's whispered from the mouth of a mystic in a smoky room or blasted across television screens by a self-styled prophet, there's something magnetic about someone claiming to know the future. But for every psychic prediction that sends shivers down the spine, there's a pile of failed ones that history hasn't been kind to.

Take Harold Camping. He managed to convince a sizeable number of people that the world was going to end on 21 May 2011. Some gave up jobs, others sold homes, fully expecting to be whisked away in a Biblical rapture. When nothing happened, he pushed the date to October. That came and went too. No fanfare. Just awkward silence and a lot of confused followers.

Or remember Jeane Dixon? She was big in the 60s and claimed, among other things, that World War III would start in the 80s. Spoiler: it didn't. She also said the Soviet Union would beat the United States to the Moon, which was spectacularly off. Dixon's predictions were hit and miss, though her fame seemed to grow regardless. People have a habit of remembering the one thing that seemed accurate and forgetting the twenty that weren't.

Then there's the legendary case of William Miller in the 1840s, who announced that Christ would return in 1843. When that didn't happen, he revised it to 1844. Tens of thousands of people believed him, sold everything, and waited in white robes. Nothing happened. The day became known as the Great Disappointment, which is an apt summary.

One of the stranger moments came in 1910 when people believed Halley's Comet would wipe out humanity. There was a theory the Earth would pass through the tail of the comet and that deadly gases would poison the planet. Some even bought anti-comet pills. Turns out, Halley's Comet just carried on doing what comets do. Flying past. Not killing anyone.

Baba Vanga, (who we have written about before) the Bulgarian mystic, is often brought up in these lists. Some claims about her have been exaggerated, especially online, where vague or outright false predictions are often attributed to her. One of the more notorious fake ones is that she predicted the sinking of the Kursk submarine in 2000 "in August 1999." That quote has been stretched far beyond anything verifiable.

Another name that crops up is Sylvia Browne. She made regular TV appearances in the early 2000s and once told the mother of missing child Amanda Berry that her daughter was dead. Berry was found alive years later. There was no apology, just a kind of vague shrug. Yet people kept buying her books.

In the 1950s, Dorothy Martin gained a following when she claimed aliens told her the world would end on 21 December 1954. A group of believers gathered at her home, expecting to be rescued by spaceship. The aliens, it seemed, were no-shows. The world didn't end, but the story became a classic study in belief and denial.

One example often brought up is Nostradamus and the idea that he predicted 9/11. A commonly quoted quatrain goes something like, "In the year of the new century and nine months, from the sky will come a great King of Terror..." At first glance, it seems uncanny. The timing sounds close to September 2001, and there's mention of terror from the sky. But look closer and the cracks show. There's no mention of New York, no planes, no towers. The language is vague, poetic and wide open to interpretation. It could just as easily describe a meteor strike or an alien invasion.

The same thing happens with claims that he predicted Hitler. People point to the word "Hister" in his writings and say he must have meant Hitler. In reality, Hister was an old name for the Danube River. There's nothing in the surrounding lines that clearly points to the man himself unless you're already convinced and want it to fit. Once you strip away the modern rewording and selective reading, the predictions tend to collapse under proper scrutiny.

More recently, people have pointed to predictions around Y2K. While not from a psychic, it had the same panic energy. Some said planes would fall from the sky. Computers would explode. Society would collapse. But when 1 January 2000 arrived, nothing really happened. The lights stayed on. The world kept spinning.

It's not that people are foolish for being curious about the future. It's that the future doesn't often like being pinned down. Prophecies and predictions are, at best, guesses. Sometimes entertaining. Sometimes frightening. But history is littered with moments when confident foretelling ran headlong into the boring reality of nothing happening at all.

German TV Psychic / Tarot reader, with some of the most prophetic psychic advice I have ever seen!

 German TV Psychic / Tarot reader, with some of the most prophetic psychic advice I have ever seen!

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by BadPsychics (@badpsychics)

The Enduring Allure of Prophecy: From Ancient Oracles to Modern Mysticism

By Jon Donnis

Prophecy, or the claim to see the future, is a concept that has fascinated humanity for millennia. From ancient oracles to modern-day psychics, the belief in foretelling the future has deep roots in history and continues to influence people today. However, a critical examination reveals that many of these claims can be understood through a combination of historical practices, psychological factors, and a lack of empirical evidence.

One of the earliest and most famous forms of prophecy can be traced back to ancient Greece. The Delphic Oracle, which operated at the Temple of Apollo in Delphi, was central to Greek society for centuries. The priestess of the temple, known as the Pythia, would enter a trance-like state, during which she was believed to channel the god Apollo. The prophecies she gave were often cryptic and open to interpretation. These vague messages were eagerly sought by city-states, politicians, and military leaders, all of whom believed that guidance from Apollo could shape their decisions. However, historians suggest that the Pythia's state was likely induced by the inhalation of gases emitted from cracks in the earth, which could explain the trance-like state she experienced. (Etiope, G.,λληνικά, Χ., Favali, P., & Piccardi, S. (2006). The geological links of the ancient Delphic Oracle (Greece): A reappraisal of natural gas occurrence and origin. Geology, 34(9), 821-824.)

Aside from the Delphic Oracle, other forms of prophecy existed in the ancient world. The Oracle of Dodona, also in Greece, was associated with the rustling of the leaves of a sacred oak tree. Priests interpreted these sounds as divine messages, often involving predictions about war, leadership, and other significant matters. Similarly, the Sibylline Oracles in Rome were collections of prophetic writings attributed to various priestesses, known as Sibyls, who were believed to have the ability to predict the future. These oracles held an important role in Roman religion, guiding decisions during times of crisis, particularly during wartime.

In both ancient Greece and Rome, prophecies were not only religious phenomena but also had political significance. Leaders often consulted oracles before making important decisions, such as going to war or choosing a ruler. However, it is essential to recognize that these oracles were often vague and open to interpretation, allowing them to be applied to a variety of situations. As with many religious practices, belief in the validity of these prophecies was largely a matter of faith, and their outcomes were often seen as divinely influenced, whether or not they turned out to be accurate.

Fast forward to the modern day, and the belief in seeing the future has evolved, but the essential claims remain largely unchanged. Today, psychics, astrologers, and tarot card readers offer a wide variety of services, each claiming to provide insight into a person's future. The rise of technology has brought these practices into the digital age, with psychic hotlines, online astrology readings, and apps providing a convenient way for people to engage with these services. Astrology, which originated in ancient Babylon and Greece, is one of the most popular forms of modern-day prophecy. Many people today turn to horoscopes, zodiac signs, and birth charts in the belief that the stars can offer guidance in their lives.

Despite the enduring popularity of these practices, scientific skepticism surrounding them is widespread. Psychologists and scientists have long pointed out the lack of empirical evidence supporting psychic phenomena. Many of the predictions made by psychics are vague and general enough to apply to anyone, a phenomenon known as the "Barnum effect." People tend to find personal meaning in statements that are broad and ambiguous, especially when they are told that they apply specifically to them. This is why horoscopes and tarot readings can appear to be accurate, even though they are based on chance and intuition, rather than any real foresight.

Moreover, cognitive biases play a significant role in shaping belief in prophecy. Confirmation bias, the tendency to seek out information that supports existing beliefs, can make people believe that a psychic's prediction is correct, even when it is not. People are also prone to the illusion of control, in which they believe that their actions or beliefs can influence events outside their control, such as the future. These psychological tendencies help explain why people continue to seek out psychics and oracles, despite the lack of scientific support for such practices.

While there is no scientific evidence to support the idea of psychic abilities or seeing the future, it is undeniable that the belief in prophecy has a deep cultural and psychological appeal. Whether through the ancient oracles of Greece and Rome or the modern-day psychics who offer their services online, the desire to glimpse into the future remains a powerful force in human society. However, it is important to approach these practices with a critical mindset, recognizing that they are rooted more in faith and psychology than in any proven ability to predict future events.

The concept of seeing the future has been around for thousands of years, beginning with the ancient oracles of Greece and Rome. While these early examples of prophecy had significant social and political importance, they were ultimately based on faith and interpretation, rather than any empirical evidence. Today, modern psychics and astrologers continue to offer predictions, but their claims are largely unsupported by scientific research. As fascinating as prophecy may be, it remains a practice that is best understood through the lens of psychology, cultural history, and skepticism.

Kenneth Copeland: Televangelist and Prosperity Gospel Advocate

Kenneth Copeland is an American televangelist best known for preaching the prosperity gospel, a controversial belief that God rewards faithfulness with material wealth. As the founder of Kenneth Copeland Ministries, he has become one of the most recognized figures in televangelism, though his ministry has been the subject of ongoing scrutiny.

Born in Lufkin, Texas, in 1936, Copeland initially pursued a career in aviation before transitioning to ministry in the late 1960s. He quickly became known for his teachings on prosperity, which emphasize that faithful followers who give money to the church and live according to Christian principles will receive wealth and success from God. This message resonated with a large audience, and Copeland’s broadcasts reached millions of viewers worldwide.

However, his ministry has been surrounded by controversy, particularly concerning his lavish lifestyle. Critics argue that Copeland has used his followers' donations to fund an extravagant way of life, which includes multiple luxury homes and private jets. This has led to accusations of hypocrisy, especially considering his message of prosperity while living in extreme wealth. In 2007, Copeland was part of a Senate investigation into the financial practices of televangelists, though no criminal charges were filed.

Despite the criticisms, Copeland’s ministry remains influential, with millions of followers who continue to support his teachings. His message of wealth through faith appeals to many, while others view his practices as exploiting vulnerable people. For his supporters, Copeland is seen as a messenger of God’s blessings, while detractors view him as a symbol of the commercialization of religion.

In the world of televangelism, Kenneth Copeland is both a prominent figure and a deeply polarizing one. His teachings continue to draw both admiration and criticism, and his legacy in the Christian community remains a topic of debate.

TV’s Best Fake Psychics: When Pretend Powers Cause Real Chaos

By Jon Donnis

Fake psychics and fraudulent mediums have been a goldmine for television storytelling, creating plenty of hilarious and dramatic moments as their schemes slowly unravel. Whether they are bumbling con artists or slick manipulators, these characters thrive on deception, using clever tricks and theatrical flair to convince others of their supernatural abilities. The real magic happens when their lies come crashing down, leaving behind chaos, comedy, or even the occasional heartfelt revelation. Let's take a closer look at some of TV's most memorable phoney psychics and the episodes where they almost got away with it.

In Psych (2006-2014), Shawn Spencer builds an entire career on his fake psychic abilities. In reality, Shawn is just hyper-observant, with a photographic memory and razor-sharp attention to detail. In the pilot episode, "Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Piece" (S1, E2), Shawn pretends to have visions to solve a high-profile theft, fooling the Santa Barbara Police Department into hiring him as a consultant. The show thrives on the comedic tension of Shawn maintaining the ruse, especially as his best friend Gus constantly worries about being caught. The beauty of Psych is that Shawn's deception comes from a good place, he genuinely wants to help people, even if he has to flail around and pretend to receive divine visions to do it.

Frasier (1993-2004) also pokes fun at fake psychics in "The Friend" (S5, E16). When Daphne's friend, a self-proclaimed psychic named Bonnie, claims to see the future, Frasier can't resist trying to disprove her powers. The episode brilliantly showcases Frasier's arrogance as he becomes increasingly frustrated by Bonnie's vague predictions coming true through sheer coincidence. The more he tries to expose her, the more ridiculous he looks, culminating in an embarrassing confrontation at his radio station. It's classic Frasier, a mix of highbrow intellectualism crashing headfirst into petty squabbles.

In Brooklyn Nine-Nine (2013-2021), the precinct deals with a fraudster in "Bad Beat" (S5, E8). A psychic named Dan "The Man" claims to have information about a case, but Jake Peralta quickly sees through the act. The episode leans into the absurdity of Dan's vague "visions", with Jake setting up increasingly elaborate traps to catch him out. In true Brooklyn Nine-Nine fashion, the situation escalates to ridiculous proportions, including a fake séance and a ghost-hunting stakeout. It's a perfect example of the show's playful energy, turning the fake psychic trope into a full-blown farce.

Even more serious shows have explored the theme. The Mentalist (2008-2015) revolves entirely around the idea of exposing fraudulent mediums. Patrick Jane, a former con artist who pretended to communicate with the dead, now works with the CBI to catch criminals. The pilot episode introduces Jane's past as a fake psychic, revealing that his deception inadvertently made his family a target for the serial killer Red John. Jane spends the series using his old cold-reading tricks to outsmart killers, carrying the weight of his past mistakes as he tries to make amends. It's a darker exploration of the damage fake psychics can cause, adding emotional depth to the usual con-artist storyline.

Even Supernatural (2005-2020) couldn't resist playing with the concept in "The Mentalists" (S7, E7). The Winchester brothers investigate a town full of self-proclaimed mediums, only to discover that one of them is accidentally channeling real spirits. The episode is a clever twist on the fake psychic trope, blending supernatural horror with the comedy of watching scammers freak out when they realise they are way out of their depth.

Fake psychics make for brilliant television because they walk the line between villainy and vulnerability. Their deception can cause harm, but there is often an underlying desperation driving their lies. Whether they are attention-seekers, opportunists, or people just trying to make a living, these characters remind us of the human desire for answers and connection. Watching them get caught out is satisfying, but the best shows leave room for a little empathy too. After all, while fake psychics might not have real powers, their stories still have a way of pulling viewers in.

The Art of Deception: Movies Featuring Bad Psychics and Mediums

The following article was provided by the good people at BeenToTheMovies.com

Throughout cinema history, the idea of con artists posing as psychics or mediums has provided the perfect setup for mystery, comedy, and even horror. Whether these characters are exploiting people's grief, running elaborate scams, or unexpectedly encountering real supernatural forces, the trope of the fake psychic has been a rich source of storytelling. Here are some of the most memorable films that have played with this fascinating plot device.

1. Nightmare Alley (1947 & 2021)

Both versions of Nightmare Alley, based on the novel by William Lindsay Gresham, follow the downfall of a charismatic carnival con man, Stanton Carlisle. In both the 1947 classic and Guillermo del Toro's 2021 adaptation, Stanton learns the tricks of the trade from a seasoned mentalist, using coded signals and clever showmanship to convince audiences he has psychic abilities. As he rises from small-time grifts to high-society cons, he becomes entangled in a dangerous scheme that ultimately exposes the cost of his deception. Nightmare Alley is a gripping psychological thriller that showcases the dark side of exploiting belief for personal gain.

2. Red Lights (2012)

This underrated psychological thriller stars Cillian Murphy and Sigourney Weaver as skeptical investigators dedicated to exposing fraudulent psychics. Their primary target is Simon Silver (Robert De Niro), a blind, world-famous medium who comes out of retirement. While the film initially focuses on the scientific debunking of supernatural claims, it takes unexpected turns as the investigators begin to question whether Silver might actually possess real abilities. Red Lights plays with the audience's expectations, blurring the line between skepticism and belief in a way that keeps viewers guessing.

3. Ghost (1990)

While Ghost is primarily a romantic supernatural drama, Whoopi Goldberg's character, Oda Mae Brown, is a classic example of a fraudulent medium who gets in over her head. Initially a con artist running a phony psychic reading business, Oda Mae is stunned when she realizes she can actually hear the ghost of Sam Wheat (Patrick Swayze). The film brilliantly flips the trope by turning the fake psychic into an unexpected hero, as Oda Mae becomes the link between Sam and his grieving girlfriend, Molly.

4. Seance on a Wet Afternoon (1964)

This British psychological thriller follows a struggling medium, Myra Savage, who orchestrates a kidnapping with her husband, claiming she will use her "psychic powers" to locate the missing child. However, as the plan spirals out of control, Myra's grip on reality begins to slip. This eerie and unsettling film is a slow-burning character study of desperation and delusion, showing how a fake medium can become consumed by their own deception.

5. The Frighteners (1996)

Peter Jackson's horror-comedy The Frighteners follows Frank Bannister (Michael J. Fox), a scam artist who can actually see ghosts. Frank uses his spectral friends to "haunt" homes, only to swoop in and offer his services as a ghostbuster, for a price. However, when a real malevolent spirit begins killing people, Frank is forced to step up as an unlikely hero. Blending comedy, horror, and supernatural mystery, The Frighteners offers a fun and fresh take on the fake psychic trope.

The Lasting Appeal of the Fake Psychic Trope

The concept of a con artist pretending to have supernatural abilities remains a powerful storytelling device. It allows for thrilling narratives that explore deception, morality, and the human need for belief, whether in the paranormal or in something greater than ourselves. Whether used for horror, drama, or comedy, the fake psychic trope continues to fascinate audiences and deliver compelling stories full of twists and surprises.

What's your favorite movie featuring a fake psychic or medium? Let us know in the comments!

Psychics and Mediums: The Legal Landscape in the UK

By Jon Donnis

Psychics and mediums have always sparked curiosity, fascination, and, of course, skepticism. From claims of contacting the dead to offering predictions about the future, many people believe in their abilities, while others remain doubtful. In the UK, there is no specific law directly regulating psychics or mediums, but they are still bound by general consumer protection laws, fraud regulations, and rules designed to protect vulnerable individuals. Let's take a look at how the law deals with psychics and their claims, and how things have evolved over the years.

Unlike some professions, psychics and mediums in the UK do not need any formal qualifications or licensing to practice. This lack of regulation means they can operate freely, as long as they do not make fraudulent or misleading claims. While psychics are free to charge for their services, the law steps in when claims become specific, falsifiable, or deliberately deceptive. For example, if a psychic says they can contact the dead and charge money for it, but it is shown to be false, they might be in breach of the law. The problem is that many psychics keep their claims vague, such as saying "I sense a presence" or "The spirits are guiding me." This leaves plenty of room for interpretation and makes it difficult for the law to take action.

One important law worth mentioning is the Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951, which made it illegal for anyone to claim they could use spiritualism or other similar methods to deceive people for financial gain. In theory, psychics could be prosecuted under this law if they misled people into believing they had genuine supernatural abilities. However, the act had significant limitations. It was difficult to prove that a psychic was intentionally deceiving someone, and the law was rarely enforced. Over time, the Fraudulent Mediums Act was seen as ineffective and was eventually repealed in 2008, replaced by more modern consumer protection laws.

After the repeal of the Fraudulent Mediums Act, the UK introduced the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations (CPRs) in 2008. These regulations aimed to protect consumers from misleading business practices, including psychic services. If a psychic makes a claim that cannot be proven, like guaranteeing contact with a loved one from beyond, they could be violating these rules. However, just as with the Fraudulent Mediums Act, it is tricky to bring a case against psychics because their claims are often vague. If a psychic says "I believe I can help you find answers" or "I feel a presence," it is hard to argue that they are actively trying to deceive someone.

The Fraud Act 2006 is another piece of legislation that could apply to psychics. If a psychic makes false claims with the intent to deceive for financial gain, they could be charged with fraud under this law. However, again, proving that a psychic knowingly misled someone is difficult, especially when their language remains open-ended. Many psychics operate in a way that makes it hard to pinpoint clear deceit. They often say things like "I sense someone nearby" or "The spirits are speaking to me" without offering concrete proof, which makes it difficult for the law to get involved.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) also plays a role in keeping psychic advertising in check. If a psychic makes misleading claims in their ads, the ASA can investigate and ask for the removal or revision of the advertisements. This ensures that psychics do not advertise things they cannot prove, like promising to contact the dead or predict the future with certainty.

Another important issue in the regulation of psychics and mediums is the potential for exploitation, especially of vulnerable individuals. Many people turn to psychics in times of emotional distress, such as after the loss of a loved one or during personal crises. Psychics who take advantage of people's vulnerability by offering false hope or charging excessive fees for services can be seen as exploiting their clients. While there are laws designed to prevent aggressive or coercive practices, proving exploitation in the case of psychics is difficult. The line between providing comfort and exploiting someone's grief can be blurry, and as a result, psychics are often able to operate without facing significant legal consequences.

The legal framework surrounding psychics and mediums in the UK has evolved over time, but there remain gaps in regulation. The repeal of the Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951 in 2008 reflected a shift towards more modern consumer protection laws, but proving fraudulent claims or exploitation remains a challenge. The general approach of the law has been to focus on preventing misleading advertising and fraud, but due to the subjective nature of psychic practices, many psychics continue to operate without facing legal repercussions. With the rise of online psychics, there are growing concerns about the effectiveness of the current regulatory framework. Online psychics often operate across borders, making enforcement even more difficult.

While psychics and mediums are still allowed to practice freely in the UK, they must adhere to general consumer protection laws and fraud regulations. However, proving fraud or exploitation is often a complex task. As the popularity of psychics continues to grow, particularly in the digital age, there is increasing debate about whether the legal framework should be updated to provide stronger protection for consumers. For now, psychics and mediums continue to exist in a space where their claims remain open to interpretation, and the legal system is largely reactive when it comes to addressing deceptive practices.

The Myth of the 'Living Nostradamus': Separating Fact from Fiction in Athos Salomé's Predictions

By Jon Donnis

Athos Salomé, a Brazilian psychic who has been dubbed the "Living Nostradamus," has gained significant media attention in recent years. He is frequently featured in UK tabloids like the Daily Express, where his supposed supernatural insights are presented with intrigue and speculation. Salomé claims to possess an extraordinary ability to foresee global events, drawing comparisons to the 16th-century seer Nostradamus, (hence the ridiculous nickname). However, a closer examination of his history, claims, and the evidence surrounding his predictions raises questions about the validity of his supposed psychic abilities.

Salomé's rise to prominence in the media has been driven by his bold assertions that he predicted major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine. These claims have cemented his reputation as a modern-day prophet. He also asserts that his abilities stem from a supernatural gift, allowing him to perceive events before they unfold. Yet, there is little in the way of verifiable evidence to support these statements. Many of his predictions, when scrutinised, appear to rely on vague language and retroactive interpretations, a common hallmark of so-called psychic phenomena.

For instance, Salomé claims to have foreseen the COVID-19 pandemic, but his alleged prediction is steeped in ambiguity. He is reported to have mentioned a "global disruption" and "biological threats" in statements prior to the pandemic. However, such phrases are broad and could be applied to numerous scenarios. Crucially, there is no concrete proof that these statements were made before the pandemic began. In many cases, claims of prior predictions rely on unverifiable or undated sources, making it impossible to confirm whether they were genuine foresights or post-event fabrications.

The same can be said of his assertion that he predicted the conflict in Ukraine. Salomé has pointed to statements about "Eastern unrest" as evidence of his prophetic insight. Yet, political tensions in Eastern Europe have been an ongoing concern for decades, and the suggestion of unrest in this region could be viewed as an educated guess rather than a supernatural vision. Skeptics argue that such predictions are more a matter of probability and intuition than any genuine psychic ability.

More recently, Salomé made headlines by claiming to have warned King Charles III about potential prostate health issues prior to public announcements about the King undergoing treatment. While this claim has garnered attention, it is worth noting that health issues are not uncommon as people age, and a prediction of such a general nature does not necessarily indicate psychic insight. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that Salomé communicated this warning directly to the King or that it was taken seriously by anyone within the royal household.

Salomé's predictions for 2024 included forecasts of global conflicts, natural disasters, and technological breakthroughs. While these predictions may capture public imagination, they are strikingly similar to the kinds of events that occur with regularity in any given year. Without specific details or verifiable evidence that these statements were made well in advance, they do little to substantiate claims of extraordinary foresight. The general nature of such predictions allows for significant leeway in interpretation, enabling them to be retrospectively aligned with actual events. For example I could claim that a Hurricane will cause great damage on the East Coast of America in 2025, and I will probably be right since that happens every year.

Scientific investigation into psychic phenomena has repeatedly demonstrated the unreliability of such claims. Studies on alleged psychics often reveal that their predictions are no more accurate than random chance. The human tendency to seek patterns and make sense of vague statements, known as the Barnum effect, plays a significant role in how people interpret psychic predictions. Salomé's assertions appear to fall squarely within this realm, relying on ambiguous language and the selective memory of his followers to lend them credibility.

Ultimately, Athos Salomé's claims warrant scepticism. While he has undoubtedly carved out a niche in the world of tabloid intrigue, the evidence supporting his psychic abilities remains unconvincing. His predictions, when stripped of their mystique, often resemble educated guesses rather than genuine prophecy. For those seeking to evaluate his claims critically, it is essential to demand clear, verifiable evidence and resist the allure of vague and retrospective interpretations.